This is kind of an interesting issue, especially since our society has gotten used to the Lady Gaga's and Miley Cyrus' of the world bearing all. Do you think it was right of the organizers to issue this advisory or do you think they're trampling on the creativity of the famous?
The Grammy Awards Show organizers likely created this restriction in order to prevent any mishaps occurring on the network to avoid fines and/or bad publicity. I think to an extent it's good that the organizers have made this rule but they shouldn't fully limit the creativity of the artist.
I think this is kind of weird! I get not showing that much skin on the red carpet out of respect to tradition and stuff, but while performing? I have never seen a popstar without some skin showing while performing. It will be interesting to see what the peformers will choose to wear and if they will follows these rules! (Can't wait to see Miley's outfit of choice!)
I feel as if it recent years the ammount of skin showing has gotten out of hand and the commitee is maybe trying to combat that.
-- Edited by Zoe Kline-Koenig on Monday 6th of January 2014 07:24:30 PM
I'm glad someone's made some rules about skin showing! I think designers have a right to display their creativity on beautiful celebrities, but without a limit designers could come up with something crazier than what Miley Cyrus wore at her twerking performances!
i think it was right for these organizers to create a dress code i mean little kids would be watching this and i bet you wont want them seeing that type of such
i think the nominees should be allowed to wear whatever they want as long as they're wearing something, i mean its up to the artist really and a lot of the time what they wear is what symbolizes them and how they want to portray themselves
I think society is more excepting if a artist wears something outrages to an award show now a days. As long as the wear at least something I don't see an issue. You need to be able to express yourself.
