EDHS Contemporary World Affairs

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: As genocide raged, general's pleas for help ignored _-={[M00S3M1ST]}=-_


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 183
Date:
As genocide raged, general's pleas for help ignored _-={[M00S3M1ST]}=-_


In 1993 a Canadian Lieutenant General named Romeo Dallaire was given command over U.N. peacekeepers in Rwanda. He left a year later a broken man, having helplessly watched more than 800,000 people die despite his pleas for help during the genocide in Rwanda. He knows that if the U.N. had assisted by sending more troops they could have saved hundreds of thousands.

What alternatives could the U.N. have taken rather than just sit idly by and refuse the sending of more troops?


http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/africa/11/13/sbm.dallaire.profile/index.html



-- Edited by Scottster at 19:44, 2008-12-03

__________________

Life sucks...get a helmet
-Scotty George Cowart



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 101
Date:

Maybe they could have sent some more troops? Sounds like the most logical solution to me.
Also, maybe ol' Romeo could have sent some hockey players from Canada. Those guys seem pretty tough.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 183
Date:

Patrick that is ubsurd, hockey players cant stop bullets

__________________

Life sucks...get a helmet
-Scotty George Cowart



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 75
Date:

send more troops?
-stuart denton

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 183
Date:

the question was if they refuse to send them, what else could they do, CAUSE CLEARLY THEY WERENT GOING TO SEND THEM

__________________

Life sucks...get a helmet
-Scotty George Cowart



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 101
Date:

Maybe you should learn how to spell "absurd" before you try to combat my argument SCOTT.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 183
Date:

PATRICK,


you knowi love you, but you need to learn how to grow up and not nitpick about SPELLING because you are only distracting people from your arguement and not HELPING your SITUATION



-CLETUS

__________________

Life sucks...get a helmet
-Scotty George Cowart



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 82
Date:

sending more troops does sound like the most logical answer.
i dont know what else there is to do.

__________________

jesss.



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 101
Date:

SCOTT,

Maybe I am just trying to help people realize that improper spelling and poor grammar usage is hindering the power of their arguments. It goes to the WEIGHT not the ADMISSIBILITY.

-RIPSTER

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 75
Date:

ive thought about it, and genocide is not going to stop unless theres otheres shooting back at them.
so more soldiers is kind of the only answer.
-stuart denton

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 183
Date:

PATRICK,

The WEIGHT is irrelevant, your arguement is FALSE-truths, and an IGNORANT waste of TIME, BECAUSE you CANT argue worth the cheap off-brand shoes you WEAR you FELL-SERPENT. SO just surrender to my WILL, for IF you DONT, there will BE mental DOMINATION

i love you patrick,
-VADER

__________________

Life sucks...get a helmet
-Scotty George Cowart



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 100
Date:

i think the Rwanda situation in the 90s is quite similar to the one going on in Sudan and we've never been too quick to go and help like even during world war II we didn't go over to save the people in concentration camps for a really long time and maybe what we could have done was provide the weaker force with guns and all that stuff. I mean if we aren't going to personally go over there we could at least send aid or some sort of help.

__________________

y'all know me, still the same ol' G.



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 150
Date:

LauraHernandez17 wrote:

i think the Rwanda situation in the 90s is quite similar to the one going on in Sudan and we've never been too quick to go and help like even during world war II we didn't go over to save the people in concentration camps for a really long time and maybe what we could have done was provide the weaker force with guns and all that stuff. I mean if we aren't going to personally go over there we could at least send aid or some sort of help.



We didn't help the Jews in concentration camps right away because we didn't know about them during the begining of the war. But once we made head way into Hitler's empire and discovered the camps, we did help them.

 



__________________
The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
-Aristotle


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 100
Date:

Zach_V wrote:

 

LauraHernandez17 wrote:

i think the Rwanda situation in the 90s is quite similar to the one going on in Sudan and we've never been too quick to go and help like even during world war II we didn't go over to save the people in concentration camps for a really long time and maybe what we could have done was provide the weaker force with guns and all that stuff. I mean if we aren't going to personally go over there we could at least send aid or some sort of help.



We didn't help the Jews in concentration camps right away because we didn't know about them during the begining of the war. But once we made head way into Hitler's empire and discovered the camps, we did help them.

 

 



I know, thats what i said, we helped them not right away.. but later



__________________

y'all know me, still the same ol' G.

kb


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 125
Date:

Yeah I don't understand why they wouldn't send troops?

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard